Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time
decibel <decibel@decibel.org>
From: "Jim \"Decibel!\" Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-02-06T21:53:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
During btree index build, sort equal-keyed tuples according to their
- fbac1272b89b 8.0.0 cited
On 2/6/12 3:19 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> > While we're waiting for anyone else to weigh in with an opinion on the >> > right place to draw the line here, do you want to post an updated >> > patch with the changes previously discussed? > Well, I think we have to ask not only how many people are using > float4/8, but how many people are sorting or creating indexes on them. > I think it would be few and perhaps should be eliminated. I agree that it's probably pretty unusual to index floats. My objection was on the assumption that float8 is valid but float4 isn't. If we are going to provide a fast-path for one then we should do it for both if for no other reason than least surprise. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Architectjim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell)http://jim.nasby.net