Re: WIP patch for parameterized inner paths
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-01-17T16:02:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/17/2012 12:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Well, since I see other committers sending in patches the day after the > nominal commitfest deadline, I don't feel too bad about being a bit late > as well. To clarify the fairness standard here: submitting a patch before the CommitFest deadline, then adding it to the app, means that we will try very hard to find a reviewer for the submission during that CF. It's setting a worst-case bound on how long someone who contributes will have to wait for feedback. That delay, how long it would take before someone saw community feedback after they sent in a patch, used to be far less predictable. Something like this, sent just after the deadline, won't be assigned a reviewer by the CommitFest manager until the next CF. That doesn't mean it won't be reviewed anyway. Also, submissions that fix a regression, like this one, can easily end up on a fast track unrelated to the normal schedule. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com