Re: reprise: pretty print viewdefs

On 01/13/2012 02:50 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 01/13/2012 12:31 AM, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>>   So my conclusion is it's better than nothing, but we could do 
>> better job here.
>
>> From timeline perspective, it'd be ok to apply this patch and improve 
>> more later in 9.3+. 
>
>
> I agree, let's look at the items other than the target list during 
> 9.3. But I do think this addresses the biggest pain point.



Actually, it turns out to be very simple to add wrapping logic for the 
FROM clause, as in the attached updated patch, and I think we should do 
that for this round.

cheers

andrew