Horton

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix.

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

View thread
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-01-06T16:13:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Fix breakage from earlier plperl fix.


On 01/06/2012 10:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of vie ene 06 10:34:30 -0300 2012:
>
>> And yes, we should possibly add a regression test or two. Of course, we can't use the cause of the original complaint ($^V) in them, though.
> Why not?  You obviously can't need output it verbatim, but you could
> compare it with a different function that returns $^V stringified by a
> different mechanism.
>

not sure exactly how to in such a way that exercises this code, but feel 
free to suggest something ;-)

cheers

andrew