Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>,<david@fetter.org>
Cc: <andres@anarazel.de>,<aidan@highrise.ca>, <stark@mit.edu>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-01-04T13:35:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Wakeup WALWriter as needed for asynchronous commit performance.
- 4de82f7d7c50 9.2.0 cited
Simon Riggs wrote: > My focus was on getting something working first, then tuning. If > we're agreed that we have everything apart from the tuning then we > can proceed with tests to see which works better. Sure. I just think you are there already except for what I got into. FWIW, moving the modulus application out of the loop is a very trivial change and has no affect on the results; it's strictly a performance issue. -Kevin