Re: Request to add options to tools/git_changelog
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-04-26T19:08:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 04/26/2012 02:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane<tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Bruce Momjian<bruce@momjian.us> writes: >>> I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the >>> question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I? >> 50% I think. The only thing that's really concerning me here is that >> the reverse-sort option seems likely to be bug-inducing, and I really >> don't grasp that it has real value. But whatever. > He can't be more than 33% I think, since I use it regularly as well. :-) Perhaps he was using a weighted measure. ;-) cheers andrew