Horton

Re: ECPG FETCH readahead

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>

View thread
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Date: 2012-04-10T15:36:25Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Fix some "translator:" comments mangled by pgindent

  2. Make sure float4in/float8in accept all standard spellings of "infinity".

2012-04-10 17:34 keltezéssel, Michael Meskes írta:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> OK. Next question: now that both patches are intended to be applied,
>> should I send a unified single patch that contains the previous functionality
>> and the required fixes or a new one that only contains the last required fixes?
> I'm fine with whatever is easier for you.
>
> Michael

I guess the second option is easier for all of us because
reviewing it doesn't invalidate the previous ones.

Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi

-- 
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig&  Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
      http://www.postgresql.at/