Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>,
"Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: "Daniel Farina" <daniel@heroku.com>,"Greg Stark" <stark@mit.edu>, "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 2012-03-15T15:20:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > I think we have two choices --- either migrate the statistics, or > adopt my approach to generating incremental statistics quickly. > Does anyone see any other options? Would it make any sense to modify the incremental approach to do a first pass of any tables with target overrides, using the default GUC setting, and then proceed through the passes you describe for all tables *except* those? I'm thinking that any overrides were probably set because the columns are particularly important in terms of accurate statistics, and that running with different GUC settings will just be a waste of time for those tables -- if they have a high setting for any column, they will sample more blocks for every run, right? -Kevin