Horton

Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server

Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>

View thread
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: "Shigeru Hanada *EXTERN*" <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>, "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "Hitoshi Harada" <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>, "Kohei KaiGai" <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, "Etsuro Fujita" <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog@svana.org>
Date: 2012-02-20T15:58:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
 
> I read the example carefully, and it seems to me that it is
> necessary for the read-only transaction (T3) to be SERIALIZABLE so
> that T1 is aborted and the state that T3 saw remains valid.
 
Correct.
 
> If I understand right, I agree with your correction.
 
:-)
 
-Kevin