Re: Page Checksums

On 19.12.2011 21:27, Robert Haas wrote:
> To put this another way, we currently WAL-log just about everything.
> We get away with NOT WAL-logging some things when we don't care about
> whether they make it to disk.  Hint bits, killed index tuple pointers,
> etc. cause no harm if they don't get written out, even if some other
> portion of the same page does get written out.  But as soon as you CRC
> the whole page, now absolutely every single bit on that page becomes
> critical data which CANNOT be lost.  IOW, it now requires the same
> sort of protection that we already need for our other critical updates
> - i.e. WAL logging.  Or you could introduce some completely new
> mechanism that serves the same purpose, like MySQL's double-write
> buffer.

Double-writes would be a useful option also to reduce the size of WAL 
that needs to be shipped in replication.

Or you could just use a filesystem that does CRCs...

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com