Horton

Re: JSON for PG 9.2

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

View thread
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr, Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Joey Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Claes Jakobsson <claes@gluefinance.com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Date: 2011-12-18T17:21:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On 12/18/2011 12:17 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> One small note about the json type being an extension -- this probably
> means the json type oid won't be fixed -- not a huge deal but it could
> affect some corner cases with binary format consumers.
>
>


Why would that matter more for JSON than for any other non-core type?

cheers

andrew