Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>
From: ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-12-06T20:26:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I am for ECMA datestyle > > it is there but just is not public, if I remember well > > Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very > interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the > usage of this feature is minimal and there is risk for less advanced > users - so ECMA datestyle is very adequate solution. > > Regards > > Pavel > i don't particularly need anything other than ECMA datestyle - i was just under the impression that a more generic solution was preferred. so, ECMA is enough to stop me from making any more noise about this. pavel, is there a way i can use this currently? if not, would it take much effort to make this public? thanks, ben...