Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE

ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>

From: ben hockey <neonstalwart@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-12-06T20:26:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/6/2011 3:20 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> I am for ECMA datestyle
>
> it is there but just is not public, if I remember well
>
> Theoretically some custom output/input transform routine can be very
> interesting - for domains, for boolean type - but on second hand - the
> usage of this feature is minimal and there is risk for less advanced
> users - so ECMA datestyle is very adequate solution.
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
i don't particularly need anything other than ECMA datestyle - i was 
just under the impression that a more generic solution was preferred.  
so, ECMA is enough to stop me from making any more noise about this.

pavel, is there a way i can use this currently?  if not, would it take 
much effort to make this public?

thanks,

ben...