Re: [REVIEW] Patch for cursor calling with named parameters

Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@wicourts.gov> wrote:
> Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote:
 
>> I personally tend to believe it doesn't even need to be an error.
>> There is no technical reason not to allow it. All the user needs
>> to do is make sure that the combination of named parameters and
>> the positional ones together are complete and not overlapping.
 
> If there are no objections, I suggest that Yeb implement the mixed
> notation for cursor parameters.
 
Hearing no objections -- Yeb, are you OK with doing this, and do you
feel this is doable for this CF?
 
-Kevin