Re: testing ProcArrayLock patches
Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>
From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
To: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-11-18T18:14:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Don't elide blank lines when accumulating psql command history.
- ff4fd4bf53c5 9.2.0 cited
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I'd just drop -S. Easily done. > Make sure to use -c N -j N with pgbench, or you'll probably not be > able to saturate it. Yeah, that's part of the script I copied from you. > I've also had good luck with wal_writer_delay=20ms, although if > you have synchronous_commit=on that might not matter, and it's > much less important since Simon's recent patch in that area went > in. What the heck; will do. > What scale factor are you testing at? 100. Perhaps I should boost that since I'm going as far as 128 clients? -Kevin