Re: [v9.1] sepgsql - userspace access vector cache
Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: Kohei Kaigai <Kohei.Kaigai@emea.nec.com>
Cc: PgHacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-07-21T19:32:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove the limit on the number of entries allowed in catcaches, and
- 8b9bc234ad43 8.2.0 cited
> Is it possible to only include the syscache on --enable-selinux > configurations? It would imply physical data incompatibility with > standard configurations, but that's also true for e.g. the block size. > > Also, the tests I did with varying bucket sizes suggested that > decreasing the syscache to 256 didn't show a significant performance > decrease compared to the 2048 #buckets, for the restorecon test, which > hits over 3000 objects with security labels. My guess is that that is > a fair middle of the road database schema size. Are you unwilling to > pay the startup overhead for a extra 256 syscache? > Hello KaiGai-san, off-list, I was wondering why the catalog pg_seclabel exists at all. Why not store the labels together with the objects (pg_class, pg_attribute etc) ? The syscache wouldn't be needed in that case. regards, Yeb