Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 2
Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei.Kaigai@emea.nec.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-07-20T14:23:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2011-07-20 16:15, Yeb Havinga wrote: > On 2011-07-20 16:06, Noah Misch wrote: >> >> The SQL-level semantics of the view define the access rules in >> question. How >> would you translate that into tests to apply at a lower level? > I assumed the leaky view thread was about row level security, not > about access rules to views, since it was mentioned at the RLS wiki > page for se-pgsql. Sorry for the confusion. Had to digg a bit for the wiki, it was this one : http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/RLS#Issue:_A_leaky_VIEWs_for_RLS regards, Yeb