Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 2

Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei.Kaigai@emea.nec.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-07-20T14:23:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2011-07-20 16:15, Yeb Havinga wrote:
> On 2011-07-20 16:06, Noah Misch wrote:
>>
>> The SQL-level semantics of the view define the access rules in 
>> question.  How
>> would you translate that into tests to apply at a lower level?
> I assumed the leaky view thread was about row level security, not 
> about access rules to views, since it was mentioned at the RLS wiki 
> page for se-pgsql. Sorry for the confusion.
Had to digg a bit for the wiki, it was this one : 
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/RLS#Issue:_A_leaky_VIEWs_for_RLS

regards,
Yeb