Horton

Re: index-only scans

Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>

View thread
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-08-11T21:01:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Reduce the alignment requirement of type "name" from int to char, and arrange

On 08/11/2011 01:57 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
>> 1. The way that nodeIndexscan.c builds up the faux heap tuple is
>> perhaps susceptible to improvement.  I thought about building a
>> virtual tuple, but then what do I do with an OID column, if I have
>> one?  Or maybe this should be done some other way altogether.
>
> Maybe it's time to finally remove the been-deprecated-for-a-while OIDs?

As a user space option certainly. However they are also used to track 
system objects, I don't know that we need to get rid of them for that 
purpose. We just need to remove WITH/WITHOUT OIDS for user tables.

JD
-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579