Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2011-06-15T14:05:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 06/14/2011 11:01 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > You might remember we added a postmaster/postgres -b switch to indicate > binary upgrade mode. The attached patch prevents any client without an > application_name of 'binary-upgrade' from connecting to the cluster > while it is binary upgrade mode. This helps prevent unauthorized users > from connecting during the upgrade. This will not help for clusters > that do not have the -b flag, e.g. pre-9.1. > > Does this seem useful? Something for 9.1 or 9.2? > > This idea came from Andrew Dunstan via IRC during a pg_upgrade run by > Stephen Frost when some clients accidentally connected. (Stephen reran > pg_upgrade successfully.) > What I actually had in mind was rather different: an HBA mechanism based on appname. But on second thoughts maybe the protocol wouldn't support that. cheers andrew