Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>

Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler@timbira.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Josh Berkus <josh.berkus@pgexperts.com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2011-05-08T11:21:06Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 05/08/2011 05:24 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On lör, 2011-05-07 at 17:38 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 05/07/2011 05:26 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On lör, 2011-05-07 at 17:16 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> pg_config is useful quite apart from its use in building things, as was
>>>> discussed upthread.
>>> Link please.
>>>
>> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-05/msg00275.php>
> That thread just asserts that it might be useful, and I responded by
> asking for what.

As I said there: "to see how the libraries are configured, for example."

Just the other day I wanted to know what compilation options had been 
used for a particular installation. pg_config wasn't installed because 
the -devel package wasn't installed, and it would have saved me quite 
some time if pg_config had been available.

Another example is to find out what the installation is using for 
shares, the service directory and so on.

cheers

andrew