Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais <ioguix@free.fr>
From: "Jehan-Guillaume (ioguix) de Rorthais" <ioguix@free.fr>
To: damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>
Cc: Roy Hann <specially@processed.almost.meat>, pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-05-05T12:36:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 05/05/2011 14:29, damien clochard wrote: > Le 04/05/2011 13:38, Roy Hann a écrit : >> Joshua Berkus wrote: >> >>> When doing PR, it's more important to use terms people recognize than to use >>> terms which are perfectly accurate. Nobody expects a news article to >>> be perfectly accurate anyway. >>> >>> However, I posted this because I think that several folks in the community feel >>> that this is going too far into the land of marketese, and I want to >>> hash it out and get consensus before we start pitching 9.1 final. >> >> Call 'em table-valued variables. >> > > How about "Volatile Tables" ? > > It makes it pretty clear that you cannot put valuable data in it. > In the same time the word implies that the tables are gonna be faster > than standard tables (like volatile memory being faster Disk storage) Yeah, but volatile means « lost on shutdown », which is not the case here during a clean shutdown. > Plus it's easy to translate in French :P