Horton

Re: Reports on obsolete Postgres versions

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

View thread
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider@ardentperf.com>, Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-02T20:48:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
> On 2 Apr 2024, at 22:46, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr  2, 2024 at 11:34:46AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:

>> I do like the term "current"  better. It conveys (at least a bit) that we
>> really consider all the older ones to be, well, obsolete. The difference
>> "current vs obsolete" is stronger than "latest vs not quite latest".
> 
> Okay, I changed "superseded" to "old", and changed "latest" to
> "current", patch attached.

+1, LGTM

--
Daniel Gustafsson