Re: pgindent weirdness
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-04-20T17:17:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Latest consolidated typedef list from buildfarm.
- fe1438da8aa8 9.1.0 cited
On 04/20/2011 01:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> wrote: >> I did carefully warn you about the need to check the effects of the changes >> when I committed the new list. >> >> It looks like quite a few of the deletions come into this category, for >> example just looking at the diff here >> <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/fe1438da8aa8a45f2cee816eb54841f97d3b2f22#src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list> >> I see AggHashEntryData, AggStatePerAggData, AllocBlockData, and >> AllocChunkData from among the first few that were deleted and all are in the >> same category. > This implies to me that we changed something about how we handle this > since we did the 9.0 runs, but I don't know what it was. Should I? > We have newer compilers which probably construct the symbol tables slightly differently. cheers andrew