Re: pgindent weirdness

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-04-20T17:17:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Latest consolidated typedef list from buildfarm.


On 04/20/2011 01:12 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  wrote:
>> I did carefully warn you about the need to check the effects of the changes
>> when I committed the new list.
>>
>> It looks like quite a few of the deletions come into this category, for
>> example just looking at the diff here
>> <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/fe1438da8aa8a45f2cee816eb54841f97d3b2f22#src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list>
>> I see AggHashEntryData, AggStatePerAggData, AllocBlockData, and
>> AllocChunkData from among the first few that were deleted and all are in the
>> same category.
> This implies to me that we changed something about how we handle this
> since we did the 9.0 runs, but I don't know what it was.  Should I?
>

We have newer compilers which probably construct the symbol tables 
slightly differently.

cheers

andrew