Re: SSI bug?
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Dan Ports <drkp@csail.mit.edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2011-04-11T11:01:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Update key words table for 9.1
- bf6848bc8c82 9.1.0 cited
-
Documented some ecpg command line options that were missing:
- 71ac48fd9ceb 9.1.0 cited
On 03.04.2011 09:16, Dan Ports wrote: > I think I see what is going on now. We are sometimes failing to set the > commitSeqNo correctly on the lock. In particular, if a lock assigned to > OldCommittedSxact is marked with InvalidSerCommitNo, it will never be > cleared. > > The attached patch corrects this: > TransferPredicateLocksToNewTarget should initialize a new lock > entry's commitSeqNo to that of the old one being transferred, or take > the minimum commitSeqNo if it is merging two lock entries. > > Also, CreatePredicateLock should initialize commitSeqNo for to > InvalidSerCommitSeqNo instead of to 0. (I don't think using 0 would > actually affect anything, but we should be consistent.) > > I also added a couple of assertions I used to track this down: a > lock's commitSeqNo should never be zero, and it should be > InvalidSerCommitSeqNo if and only if the lock is not held by > OldCommittedSxact. > Thanks, committed this. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com