Re: REVIEW: Extensions support for pg_dump
Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi.kaariainen@thl.fi>
From: Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi.kaariainen@thl.fi>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-01-18T08:37:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 01/17/2011 07:58 PM, Kääriäinen Anssi wrote: > The issue I saw was this: assume you have an extension foo, containing one function, test(). > > CREATE EXTENSION foo; > DROP FUNCTION test(); > -- restricted due to dependency > > ALTER FUNCTION test() RENAME TO test2; > DROP FUNCTION test2(); > -- not restricted! > > The same can be done using CREATE OR REPLACE. > > I hope this is not an error on my part. It is possible because I had a lot of schemas and my search_path might have been wrong... The rename is an error on my part, sorry for that. Renaming can be done, but dropping is not possible even after rename. But a function in a package can be CREATE OR REPLACEd, and after that the function can be dropped. COR should be restricted in the same way as DROP is. I will check if this is still a problem with the latest patch. Another problem is that you can ALTER FUNCTION test() SET SCHEMA = something_else, and you can alter the functions search_path, which could be a problem for non-relocatable extensions. Even if the schema is changed, dropping extension / altering extension will work as expected. The function is just in different schema than the extension. But, both of these IMO fall in the category "don't do that". - Anssi