Re: Sync Rep Design
Josh Berkus <josh@postgresql.org>
From: Josh Berkus <josh@postgresql.org>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>, greg@2ndQuadrant.com, Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-01-04T22:18:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> What about the HBA here? Hmmm. That's tempting; an "synchronous" HBA instead of a GUC? But that doesn't solve the problem of "standby #6 is failing, I want to kick it off synch rep". I'd be opposed to having a GUC *and* an HBA. making DBAs set things independantly in two places just frustrates our users. --Josh