Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>

Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2010-12-24T23:37:26Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 12/24/2010 06:26 PM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@commandprompt.com>  wrote:
>
>> I would have to agree here. The idea that we have to search email is bad
>> enough (issue/bug/feature tracker anyone?) but to have someone say,
>> search the archives? That is just plain rude and anti-community.
> Saying "search the bugtracker" is no less rude than "search the archives"...
>
> And most of the bugtrackers I've had to search have way *less*
> ease-of-use for searching than a good mailing list archive (I tend to
> keep going back to gmane's search)
>
>

It's deja vu all over again. See mailing list archives for details.

cheers

andrew