Re: wCTE behaviour

Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko.tiikkaja@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>
Date: 2010-12-22T18:40:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> .. and a wild patch appears.
>>
>> This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
>> CommandCounterIncrement()s.  It's still a bit rough around the edges
>> and
>> needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway.
>
> Is this the patch of record?  There are no changes to the documentation
> included.

I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched 
it in a very long time.  I will work on the documentation if there's a 
chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1.  This arrangement makes 
more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree.


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja