Re: Final(?) proposal for wal_sync_method changes
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-12-10T02:50:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote: > Did you rerun test_sync with O_DIRECT entabled, using my patch? The > figures you had from test_fsync earlier were without O_DIRECT. > No--I was just focused on testing the changes that had already been committed. The use of O_DIRECT in the server but not test_fsync could very well be the reason for the difference; don't know yet. I'm trying to get through this CF before I start getting distracted by newer patches, I'll get to yours soon I hope. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support www.2ndQuadrant.us "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books