Horton

Re: Re: synchronous_commit and synchronous_replication Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication.

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>

View thread
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-04-05T08:33:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 05.04.2011 11:31, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com>  writes:
>> Hmm.. I think that we reached the consensus about merging two GUCs
>> in previous discussion. You argue that synchronization level should be
>> controlled in separate two parameters?
>
> No, sorry about confusion.  One GUC is better.  What I'm wondering is
> why commit it *now*, because I think we didn't yet decide on what the
> supported behaviors supported in 9.1 should be.

What do you mean by "supported behaviors"?

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com