Thread

1. SHMEM_INDEX_SIZE exceeded on startup

   Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov> — 2011-03-29T17:20:00Z

   I doubt that this is going to matter much, and should only have a
   trivial impact on shared space calculations and postmaster and
   connection startup time, but just as a matter of principle we might
   want to set SHMEM_INDEX_SIZE at least as large as the number of
   entries in ShmemIndex.  At startup that seems to be 40 as of current
   HEAD.
    
   Trivial patch attached.
    
   -Kevin
   
   

2. Re: SHMEM_INDEX_SIZE exceeded on startup

   Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> — 2011-03-31T10:41:46Z

   On 29.03.2011 20:20, Kevin Grittner wrote:
   > I doubt that this is going to matter much, and should only have a
   > trivial impact on shared space calculations and postmaster and
   > connection startup time, but just as a matter of principle we might
   > want to set SHMEM_INDEX_SIZE at least as large as the number of
   > entries in ShmemIndex.  At startup that seems to be 40 as of current
   > HEAD.
   >
   > Trivial patch attached.
   
   Ok, committed.
   
   -- 
      Heikki Linnakangas
      EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com