Horton

Re: Another swing at JSON

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

View thread
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>
Cc: David Fetter <david@fetter.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-03-30T16:38:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On 03/30/2011 12:29 PM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  writes:
>> I think we're pretty much down to only fixing bugs now, for 9.1, and this
>> isn't a bug, however inconvenient it might be.
> It's not just inconvenient, it's setting a bad example for people to
> work on their own extensions.  It's more than unfortunate.  I will
> prepare a doc patch, but copying from contrib is the usual way to go
> creating your own extension, right?
>
>

None of that makes it a bug.

I don't have any objection to putting some comments in the contrib 
Makefiles telling people to use PGXS, but I don't think that at this 
stage of the cycle we can start work on something that so far is just an 
idea from the top of my head.

cheers

andrew