Re: Sync Rep and shutdown Re: Sync Rep v19
Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-03-22T19:25:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Document guc context values, and reference them from the config doc section.
- e148443ddd95 9.1.0 cited
On 2011-03-21 23:58, Yeb Havinga wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com > <mailto:yebhavinga@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 2011-03-21 18:04, Robert Haas wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Yeb > Havinga<yebhavinga@gmail.com <mailto:yebhavinga@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > pgbench -i -s 50 test > Two runs of "pgbench -c 10 -M prepared -T 600 test" with 1 > sync standby - > server configs etc were mailed upthread. > > - performance as of commit > e148443ddd95cd29edf4cc1de6188eb9cee029c5 > > 1158 and 1306 (avg 1232) > > - performance as of current git master > > 1181 and 1280 (avg 1230,5) > > - performance as of current git master with > sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement applied > > 1152 and 1269 (avg 1210,5) > > > > IMO what these tests have shown is that there is no 20% > performance difference between the different versions. To > determine if there are differences, n should be a lot higher, or > perhaps a single one with a very large duration. > > > pgbench -T 3600: > > sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement 1270 tps > current git master 1306 tps Result of pgbench -T 30000 sync-standbys-defined-rearrangement 1267 tps current (or few days old) git master 1326 tps So the patch eats 4,5% from git master's syncrep performance in my setup. Don't know how to measure it better than that. -- Yeb Havinga http://www.mgrid.net/ Mastering Medical Data