Re: Sync Rep v17

Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>

To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>

Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org

Date: 2011-03-02T22:10:43Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-03-02 21:26, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
> I think including "synchronous" is OK as long as it's properly
> qualified.  Off-hand thoughts in no particular order:
>
> semi-synchronous
> conditionally synchronous
> synchronous with automatic failover to standalone
It would be good to name the concept equal to how other DBMSses call it, 
if they have a similar concept - don't know if Mysql's semisynchronous 
replication is the same, but after a quick read it sounds like it does.

regards,
Yeb Havinga