Horton

Re: Sync Rep v17

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

View thread
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>
Date: 2011-03-02T20:44:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On 03/02/2011 03:39 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Truly "synchronous" requires two-phase commit, which this never was. So
> the absence or presence of the poorly specified parameter called
> allow_standalone_primary should have no bearing on what we call this
> feature.
>

I haven't been following this very closely, but to me this screams out 
that we simply must not call it "synchronous".

Just my $0.02 worth.

cheers

andrew