Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest)
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Jan Urbański <wulczer@wulczer.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-03-02T00:05:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Further refine patch for commenting operator implementation functions.
- 908ab8028640 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix citext's upgrade-from-unpackaged script to set its collation correctly.
- 94be9e3f0ca9 9.1.0 cited
-
Mark operator implementation functions as such in their comments.
- 94133a935414 9.1.0 cited
-
Add KNNGIST support to contrib/btree_gist.
- 8436489c81c2 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix plpython breakage detected on certain Fedora machines on buildfarm.
- 4c966d920fb7 9.1.0 cited
On 03/01/2011 05:19 PM, Jan Urbański wrote: > On 01/03/11 22:07, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >> On 03/01/2011 03:53 PM, Jan Urbański wrote: >>> On 01/03/11 21:35, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >>>>> I'm ok with closing things as of the end of the 15 days, say >>>>> Thursday or >>>>> Friday. >>>> It might be a good idea to make a list of what we have left to do before >>>> we can wrap an alpha. Here are some things on my list. Not all of them >>>> are necessarily release blockers, but we need to discuss which ones are: >>>> >>>> * Regression test failures from recent plpython patches. These are >>>> affecting enough machines to make them "must fix before alpha", IMO. >>>> There are some variations in error message wording, which are not too >>>> terrible but also not exactly hard to fix. The python assert failure >>>> that some Fedora machines are reporting is considerably more disturbing. >> I agree. >> >>> I'm looking into the crash, no luck so long. >>> >>> >> Is there anything you need that would help you? > Could you try this patch and see if it fixes the failures? > > I'm at a loss as to why this happens, but judging from the traceback the > spiexceptions module is getting unreffed somewhere and when garbage > collection kicks it it barfs on an object with refcount 0. So I'm > forcing an incref of the module to confirm that. > > I tried various tricks on 32 bit Debian, with Python 2.6, 2.7, Python > compiled from Fedora's SRPM and I never saw anything wrong. Will keep on > trying, but tommorrow evening, time to sleep :( > > Thanks. That seems to have fixed it, so I have applied the patch. Would you like to supply some comments to got with it? cheers andrew