Re: Correctly producing array literals for prepared statements

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>
Cc: Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-23T20:50:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/23/2011 02:21 PM, Andrew Chernow wrote:
>
>> Binary mode had serious limitations, such as portability.
>>
>
> What are the other limitations?
>
> As far as portability is concerned, we are using it on many different 
> operating systems and architectures without issue.  Even our most 
> recent bump to 9.0.1 and 9.0.3 was flawless in regard to 
> libpq/libpqtypes.


It's probably fine if you can control both ends. But there is no 
guarantee of portability, nor does it seem likely to me there ever will 
be, so I don't find your assertion terribly useful. The fact that it 
hasn't broken for you doesn't mean it can't or won't be.

The other downside I see is that binary protocols are often a lot harder 
to debug, but maybe that's just me.

cheers

andrew