Re: Correctly producing array literals for prepared statements
Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>
From: Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-23T19:21:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Binary mode had serious limitations, such as portability. > What are the other limitations? As far as portability is concerned, we are using it on many different operating systems and architectures without issue. Even our most recent bump to 9.0.1 and 9.0.3 was flawless in regard to libpq/libpqtypes. > We do need some support in libpq for constructing and deconstructing > arrays (and probably for composites too, although that will be harder, I > suspect). > [sigh...] -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC global backup http://www.esilo.com/