Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Cc: PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-15T13:24:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11.02.2011 22:44, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
>   Looks like the function get_actual_variable_range() was written with the
> knowledge that virtual/hypothetical indexes may exist, but the assumption
> seems wrong.
>
> One one hand get_actual_variable_range() expects that virtual indexes do not
> have an OID assigned, on the other hand explain_get_index_name_hook() is
> handed just an index's OID to get its name back; IMHO these are based on two
> conflicting assumptions about whether a virtual index will have an OID
> assigned.
>
> Attached patch fix_get_actual_variable_range.patch tries to fix this by
> introducing a new hook that can help Postgres decide if an index is
> fictitious or not.

The new hook takes an index oid as argument, so I gather that you 
resolved the contradiction by deciding that fictitious indexes have 
OIDs. How do you assign those OIDs? Do fictitious indexes have entries 
in pg_index?

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com