Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again...

Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>

From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-10T17:09:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
On 02/10/2011 11:01 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> But I'm not interested in implementing Oracle-like hints just because
> Oracle has them, which I think was basically what the OP wanted.

Hilariously, I'm not so sure that's what the OP wanted. Several of us 
pointed him to EnterpriseDB and their Oracle-style syntax, and the only 
thing he said about that was to use it as further evidence that 
PostgreSQL should implement them. I'm very tempted to say he wanted 
something for free, and was angry he couldn't get it.

-- 
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas@peak6.com

______________________________________________

See  http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer.php
for terms and conditions related to this email