Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-07T22:06:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add new buffers_backend_fsync field to pg_stat_bgwriter.
- 3134d8863e84 9.1.0 cited
Kevin Grittner wrote: > There are occasional posts from those wondering why their read-only > queries are so slow after a bulk load, and why they are doing heavy > writes. (I remember when I posted about that, as a relative newbie, > and I know I've seen others.) > Sure; I created http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Hint_Bits a while back specifically to have a resource to explain that mystery to offer people. But there's a difference between having a performance issue that people don't understand, and having a real bottleneck you can't get rid of. My experience is that people who have hint bit issues run into them as a minor side-effect of a larger vacuum issue, and that if you get that under control they're only a minor detail in comparison. Makes it hard to get too excited about optimizing them. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us "PostgreSQL 9.0 High Performance": http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books