Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-06T17:50:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/06/2010 12:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  writes:
>> Yeah. I'm still not convinced that using shared memory is a bad way to
>> pass these around. Surely we're not talking about large numbers of them.
>> What am I missing here?
> They're not of a very predictable size.
>
>

Ah. Ok.

cheers

andrew