Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-06T17:50:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/06/2010 12:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> Yeah. I'm still not convinced that using shared memory is a bad way to >> pass these around. Surely we're not talking about large numbers of them. >> What am I missing here? > They're not of a very predictable size. > > Ah. Ok. cheers andrew