Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-03T17:37:11Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 12/03/2010 12:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie dic 03 13:56:32 -0300 2010: > >> I know the use cases are limited, but I think it's still useful on its own. > I don't understand what's so difficult about starting with the snapshot > cloning patch. AFAIR it's already been written anyway, no? Yeah. If we can do it then this whole argument becomes moot. Like you I don't see why we can't. cheers andrew