Re: SQL/MED estimated time of arrival?
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Shigeru HANADA <hanada@metrosystems.co.jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Hitoshi Harada <umi.tanuki@gmail.com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@gmail.com>, Eric Davies <eric@barrodale.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-23T10:30:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 23.11.2010 12:09, Shigeru HANADA wrote: > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 21:16:05 -0500 > Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > <snip> >> Ultimately, we probably want and need to get this patch down to chunks >> of less than 2000 lines each. But for starters, it looks quite simple >> to break this into three chunks: one for the PostgreSQL FDW, one for >> the CSV FDW, and one for the core functionality. I think that the CSV >> FDW, like the PG FDW, should be a loadable module. > > I've separated the patch into tree parts. They have codes, documents > and tests within, and file_fdw and pgsql_fdw can be applied onto > fdw_core for each, or together. I hope the separation helps the > review of the patches. The docs need some work. The CREATE FOREIGN TABLE reference page seems to be copy-pasted from CREATE TABLE, because it talks about constraints and WITH/WITHOUT OIDS which surely don't apply to foreign tables. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com