Re: Indent authentication overloading
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-18T18:36:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11/18/2010 01:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I thought the proposal on the table was to add "peer" (or some other > name) to refer to the unix-socket auth method, and use that term > preferentially in the docs, while continuing to accept "ident" as an > old name for it. Is that really too confusing? Not to me. And I think that's a good proposal. cheers andrew