Re: unlogged tables
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm@rice.edu>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-17T20:48:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 11/17/2010 03:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > I don't particularly care for the name UNSYNCED, and I'm starting not > to like UNLOGGED much either, although at least that one is an actual > word. PERMANENT and the flavors of TEMPORARY are a reasonably > comprehensible as a description of user-visible behavior, but UNLOGGED > and UNSYNCED sounds a lot like they're discussing internal details > that the user might not actually understand or care about. I don't > have a better idea right off the top of my head, though. Maybe VOLATILE for UNSYNCED? Not sure about UNLOGGED. cheers andrew