Re: unlogged tables
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, marcin mank <marcin.mank@gmail.com>, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-11-17T18:32:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 17.11.2010 17:11, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> fsync()ing the file at shutdown doesn't seem too bad to me from >> performance point of view, we tolerate that for all other tables. And >> you can always truncate the table yourself before shutdown. > > The objection to that was not about performance. It was about how > to find out what needs to be fsync'd. I must be missing something: we handle that just fine with normal tables, why is it a problem for unlogged tables? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com