Re: Slow count(*) again...
Mladen Gogala <mgogala@vmsinfo.com>
From: Mladen Gogala <mgogala@vmsinfo.com>
To: Neil Whelchel <neil.whelchel@gmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance@postgresql.org" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-11T20:58:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-performance
Neil Whelchel wrote: > > > That is why I suggested an estimate(*) that works like (a faster) count(*) > except that it may be off a bit. I think that is what he was talking about > when he wrote this. > > The main problem with "select count(*)" is that it gets seriously mis-used. Using "select count(*)" to establish existence is bad for performance and for code readability. -- Mladen Gogala Sr. Oracle DBA 1500 Broadway New York, NY 10036 (212) 329-5251 http://www.vmsinfo.com The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions