Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>
Cc: PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-10-09T18:46:20Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/09/2010 02:19 PM, Gurjeet Singh wrote: > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Gurjeet Singh <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com > <mailto:singh.gurjeet@gmail.com>> wrote: > > This is a continuation from this thread: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-09/msg02153.php > > The attached patch allows creating a primary key using an existing > index. > > I have attached two versions of the patch: one is context diff, > and the other is the same except ignoring whitespace changes. > > > Attached are gzip'd patches for archives. Archive shows the previous > mail attachments all inline... horrible. > I wish we could get the archive processor to provide access to the attachments even if they have a MIME type of text/whatever. That's a horrid inefficiency. Maybe we could restrict it to text attachments that have a Content-Type with a name attribute that contains the string 'patch', or a similar Content-Disposition filename attribute. cheers andrew