Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-06-18T03:04:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>   
>> Currently for hstore, %% returns a flattened array and %# returns a
>> two-dimensional array.  That means that it makes sense that the operator
>> which returns an hstore subset should be something based on %, either
>> %>, %% or just %.
>>     
>
> But %% and %# are prefix operators.  Extrapolating from those to an
> infix operator seems a bit thin.  Nonetheless, something using % seems
> better than something using &, for the other reasons you mention.
>
>   
>> I vote for % .
>>     
>
> I'd vote for %>, out of those.  Reason: the operator isn't commutative,
> in fact left and right inputs aren't even the same datatype, so a glyph
> that looks asymmetric seems more natural.
>
>   



I think this bikeshed is going to be more paint than shed. However, I 
just wondered about | as the operator. Think of the right hand operand 
as a filter on the hstore, and a pipe seems to work.

Lots of operators aren't commutative. Arithmetic % for example ;-)

But honestly, I can live with just about anything.

cheers

andrew