Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-06-18T03:04:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > >> Currently for hstore, %% returns a flattened array and %# returns a >> two-dimensional array. That means that it makes sense that the operator >> which returns an hstore subset should be something based on %, either >> %>, %% or just %. >> > > But %% and %# are prefix operators. Extrapolating from those to an > infix operator seems a bit thin. Nonetheless, something using % seems > better than something using &, for the other reasons you mention. > > >> I vote for % . >> > > I'd vote for %>, out of those. Reason: the operator isn't commutative, > in fact left and right inputs aren't even the same datatype, so a glyph > that looks asymmetric seems more natural. > > I think this bikeshed is going to be more paint than shed. However, I just wondered about | as the operator. Think of the right hand operand as a filter on the hstore, and a pipe seems to work. Lots of operators aren't commutative. Arithmetic % for example ;-) But honestly, I can live with just about anything. cheers andrew