Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>

From: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
To: "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-06-17T22:25:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 6/17/10 2:03 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2010, at 1:50 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> 
>>> It isn't.  || already does what you're saying.
>> So what *does* it do?
> 
> It returns an hstore that's effectively a slice of another hstore. From the docs (http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/hstore.html):

OK, hammered this out on IRC with several Hstore users, and I think the
best answer here is consistency.  Both with the other hstore operators
and with other set types, such as intarray and ltree.

Currently for hstore, %% returns a flattened array and %# returns a
two-dimensional array.  That means that it makes sense that the operator
which returns an hstore subset should be something based on %, either
%>, %% or just %.

I vote for % .

Stuff we discussed and discarded includes:

& for two reasons: (a) it looks like a predicate and (b) it's used as
"intersect" for intarray and ltree, and we might want to implement
intersect for hstore someday.

# because it's used as "index" for intarray, and thus should more
properly be a synonym for -> in hstore

+> because it looks like it ought to be some kind of special incrementor.

Using % would also mean that sometime in the future we can implement !%
as "elements NOT in this list" (i.e. ' a => 1, b => 2, c => 5' !% 'a, b'
== 'c => 5' )

-- 
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com